Kurt Roeckx wrote:

On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.

> In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:

What compiler are you using?  I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
shows the failure)

I can compile current cvs with gcc 2.95.3, openssl 0.9.7b and zlib 1.2.1.

zlib 1.2.1 still has the same typedef though.

compile success with gcc 2.96 here.



Jan


--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to