Tom Lane wrote:

Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Marc G. Fournier wrote:


why not do both, but deprecate the use of all in the docs? say with an
eventual goal of removing the use of all altogether in 2 releases?





The extra value is fairly low IMNSHO if we can distinguish between a magical and a non-magical 'all' - see the patch I just submitted.



Also, your point about the special sameuser and samegroup keywords is a good one. We should make those all work consistently (ie, quoting makes it not a keyword). Going in the "*" direction would only make sense if that were the only special case --- but it isn't. I don't think we want to start choosing random symbols for sameuser, samegroup, and other stuff we might think of in future.




Right. Revised patch sent to patches list.


cheers

andrew




---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to