It would be interesting to see the results if you do this test again with :

- scaling factor somewhere in the 100->300 range (so the generated db ~= your ram amount)
- number of clients somewhere in 10->100
- number of transactions somewhere in 1000->1000


best wishes

Mark

P.s - Are you using the GENERIC kernel or have you built you own (e.g with SMP suppport for your hyperthreaded cpu?)

jihuang wrote:

Hi,
I have a new server and some time to do an interesting simple benchmark.
Compile PostgreSQL 7.4.1R by gcc3.2 and Intel CC 8.0 , and use pgbench to evaluate any difference..


Here is the result.

----------------------

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3052.79-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0xf29  Stepping = 9

Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX

,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs
real memory  = 3221200896 (3071 MB)
avail memory = 3130855424 (2985 MB)

FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p11
/usr/local/intel_cc_80/bin/icc -V
Intel(R) C++ Compiler for 32-bit applications, Version 8.0 Build 20031211Z Package ID: l_cc_p_8.0.055_pe057
Copyright (C) 1985-2003 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY


gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.2 [FreeBSD] 20030205 (release)

Application: PostgreSQL 7.4.1
Benchmark: pgbench

Result :
1. IntelCC ( use ports/database/postgresql7 , default )
./pgbench -U pgsql -c 30  test
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 1
number of clients: 30
number of transactions per client: 10
number of transactions actually processed: 300/300
tps = 34.975026 (including connections establishing)
tps = 35.550815 (excluding connections establishing)


2. GNU cc( use ports/database/postgresql7 , default ) ./pgbench -U pgsql -c 30 test starting vacuum...end. transaction type: TPC-B (sort of) scaling factor: 1 number of clients: 30 number of transactions per client: 10 number of transactions actually processed: 300/300 tps = 38.968321 (including connections establishing) tps = 39.707451 (excluding connections establishing)





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to