Greg Stark wrote:I would think that you would still use libpq with the binary protocol that understood an xml header requestTom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Brian Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: of some sort?? J Personally I don't see any point in xml, but if there was a standard query protocol then a client could send queries to any database that supported it without using any libraries. That might be useful. Of course you could do that without xml, but people seem to get more excited about complying with standards when they invoke xml. -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL |
- [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result sets in XML Brian Moore
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result sets in... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result set... Greg Stark
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result... Joshua D. Drake
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result set... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result sets in... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result sets in... Merlin Moncure
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result sets in... Bort, Paul
- Re: [HACKERS] Allow backend to output result sets in... Merlin Moncure
