Tom Lane wrote: > Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane writes: > >> I'm not sure there's any need for > >> src/backend/port/win32/sema.c at all. > > > (Do you have any idea on the historical > > context of this code? I wondered as to, if we have no win32 port, why there > > would be a seemingly good-to-go sema replacement?) > > [cvs is your friend...] It appears to have been added as part of the > MinGW porting work last May. I don't have much faith in it; as far as > I heard the MinGW port never got further than making the client-side > code work, and so this file has no real-world testing.
Right, that is from PeerDirect's Win32 port, with a little cleanup. It should work fine, or we can wack it around. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
