Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for > __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that? > Move along. Nothing to see here.
Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows? We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s). regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match