Tom Lane wrote: > Claudio Natoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for > > __i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that? > > Move along. Nothing to see here. > > Actually, I was expecting you to complain that the s_lock.h coding is > gcc-specific. Which compilers do we need to support on Windows? > > We might have to fall back to something comparable to the CVS-tip s_lock > support for hppa: inline assembler in s_lock.h for gcc, and a separate > assembly source file for use with vendor compiler(s).
MinGW only uses gcc so we are OK there. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
