On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Peter E. works on XML docbook version of docs. I don't know if he
> > wants to move directly to XML or uses on the fly conversion to XML
> > by osx (sgml2xml). This conversion you try use by "make testxml"
> > stuff in the doc/src/sgml/Makefile. I tested it and it works --
> > but for example conversion from XML to PDF by "fop" failed, but
> > it's might be fop problem.
>
> The general consensus is that FOP is simply not there yet.
Do you how idea how convert XML to "fo" or directly to "pdf"?
> > Peter, what's your planns?
>
> Well, when people feel good about it, we can switch the stored format to
> XML. I'm not in a hurry, though, because what is there right now is
I feel good about it. The important thing is support in Makefiles XML
conversion to other formats like HTML, PDF and man. It's strange if
after release almost nobody has idea how create PDF docs.
> almost equivalent. I've also tried out the po2xml thingy and it seems
> to work, but translating about 10000 strings seems to be a daunting
> task.
Be optimistic! ;-)
Karel
--
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server.
http://www.nod32.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
