Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we had this discussion before though, and the "parameterized" > types, like varchar(256), were not available for extended types, like > our geometries.
I can't see any way to handle parameterized types without extending the grammar individually for each one --- otherwise it's too hard to tell them apart from function calls. That makes it a bit hard to do 'em as plug-ins :-(. The grammar hacks are certainly ugly though, and if someone could think of a way, I'm all ears... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]