Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we had this discussion before though, and the "parameterized" 
> types, like varchar(256), were not available for extended types, like 
> our geometries.

I can't see any way to handle parameterized types without extending the
grammar individually for each one --- otherwise it's too hard to tell
them apart from function calls.  That makes it a bit hard to do 'em
as plug-ins :-(.  The grammar hacks are certainly ugly though, and if
someone could think of a way, I'm all ears...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to