Larry Rosenman wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > --On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 13:56:14 -0500 Bruce Momjian > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no > > waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands. > > > > Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait locking. (We > > already have two voting for such a variable.) > > > > If there is no one except Tom, we can continue. > I'm with Tom. Playing with *ALL* locks is just asking for TROUBLE.
OK, seems folks want the NO WAIT to apply only to the requested lock, and want syntax to show that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
