Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm ... I think it should be forbidden to quote a subtrans Xid as
> rollforward point. Not sure if that can be done though, or how to do
> it.
Seems like a nonissue, unless the XLOG trace makes a subtrans look the
same as a main trans, which it'd not do would it?
We could allow specification of a subtrans ID to be interpreted the same
as specification of its parent main trans. Dunno if that's actually
useful to anyone. Actually, I'd think that people would generally
specify recovery up to a particular timestamp, and not be interested in
xact numbers at all ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
