Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A simple idea would be to add the committed subxact Xids to the
> xl_xact_commit and xl_xact_abort structs. However, this will be a
> variable length array, and those structs already have variable length
> arrays at the end (filenodes to drop). I don't see how would I overlay
> that into a C struct.
Just means you have to do some address arithmetic instead of being able
to reference the additional data as a struct member. Tedious but hardly
difficult. See for instance the handling of "move" data in
XLOG_HEAP_MOVE records, or "unused" data in XLOG_HEAP_CLEAN.
I'd not recommend emitting additional xlog records unless there's a
genuine log-semantics-related reason for doing so. (Thinks about it...)
It seems like you'd want to emit a subtrans abort record to carry
information about file deletions, but there's no real need to emit
subtrans commit records, is there?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
