Andrew Dunstan wrote:
ISTM that this is being done at the wrong level anyway. I'd like to see
a facility available in our SQL, e.g.
CALL foo();
with the restriction that foo() should be declared to return void. Of
course, that doesn't remove the keyword requirement as Neil wanted, but
doing that would probably require a lot more work - we'd have to make
procedures a whole lot closer to first-class objects.
I agree with this, except that foo() should be a PROCEDURE, not a FUNCTION.
Joe
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
