Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 01:19, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> ISTM that this is being done at the wrong level anyway.
> I think these are two distinct issues.
I think Andrew has a point: why aren't they the same issue? It would
certainly be no harder to support
func( ... );
as a SQL statement than as something allowed only in plpgsql. I think
it'd be easier to make it work in the full bison grammar than with some
lookahead hack in plpgsql.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
