On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 07:35, Josh Berkus wrote: > Is there any reason that we don't have pg_functions, pg_users, pg_groups and > other system views? pg_tables and pg_views is really useful, but it would > be good to cover the other items as well.
pg_functions might be useful, but what would pg_users offer that pg_user does not already do? A pg_sequences view might also be handy. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
