Re: [HACKERS] Much Ado About COUNT(*)

[Jonah H. Harris]

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Monetary cost is not the issue - cost in time is the issue.
cheers
andrew
 

We seem to be in agreement.  I'm looking for faster/smarter access to 
data, not the monetary cost of doing so.  Isn't it faster/smarter to 
satisfy a query with the index rather than sequentially scanning an 
entire relation if it is possible?

Replying to the list as a whole:
If this is such a bad idea, why do other database systems use it?  As a 
businessperson myself, it doesn't seem logical to me that commercial 
database companies would spend money on implementing this feature if it 
wouldn't be used.  Remember guys, I'm just trying to help.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]