Hi Marc, > > > I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots > of names > > missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't > going to > > work. > Me too. Maybe some improvement in the routine.
> When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to? As I > said, > this list is of all those that submit'd patches to pgsql-patches > itself, > not any of the other lists ... if you did send it to pgsql-patches, > please > let me know the URL for the message, so that I can see what it was > overlooked, and see if I can't improve the 'search' ... > You just consider the plain text attachments. What about the encoded attachments [1] and the gziped [2] ones? IMO you need to filter out all sorts of attachments that could be possible (grep in the 'Content-Type:' could solve this) then choose the kind of attachments accepted as 'patches'. So using this approach and yours (grep plain text attachments) can lead to a reasonable result. [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-05/msg00377.php [2] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00217.php ===== Euler Taveira de Oliveira euler[at]yahoo_com_br __________________________________________________ Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
