> > I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size(). > > I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot > think of anything better at the moment though (maybe pg_component_size, > but that's equally random) :-( > > Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)
Maybe pg_trait_size() or pg_property_size() will do? -- Victor ---- Msg sent via @Mail ISP MiTS - http://www.mits.lv/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
