Bob, People,

Let me clarify my stance here, because it seems to be getting 
misrepresented.

Mark (and Nathan) pushed at repaired UUID type for possible inclusion in 
the core PostgreSQL distribution.  I'm not opposed to that, provided that 
the portability, licensing, and bugs are worked out.  Why not?  We have 
ipv6 data types, after all.

However, Mark went on to suggest that we should recommend UUID over SERIAL 
in the docs, and that we could consider dropping SERIAL entirely in favor 
of UUID:

---quoth Mark------------------
I suggest that UUID be recommended in place of SERIAL for certain
classes of applications, and that it therefore belongs in the core.
UUID and SERIAL can be used together (although, once you have a  
UUID, it may not be useful to also have a SERIAL).
---------------------------------

This was what I objected to; I believe that the use-case for UUIDs is 
actually quite narrow and assert that it's a very bad idea to promote them 
to most users.   

I have a "problem" with SERIAL abuse, too.   In general, new DB designers 
have come to increasingly believe that surrogate keys (SERIALs, UUIDs, 
hash ids etc.) are an intrinsic part of the relational model and a 
requirement for all tables.   Terrible database designs have resulted, 
chock full of tables which lack real keys and cannot be normalized.

UUIDs tend to encourage this sort of behavior even more than SERIALs, not 
because of any intrinsic quality in the data type, but because much of the 
literature on the subject treats them like some kind of "universal object 
identifier" and not distinguishing servers, relations, or real keys.  

To repeat, though, this isn't a reason to keep them out of core, but it 
*is* a reason not to throw them at newbies as the holy grail of row 
identifiers.

For my part, I generally push implementing the UUID concept in a better way 
that keeps server, table, and surrogate keys atomic (and thus more useful 
and easier to debug).

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to