Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> If my assumptions are correct, then please add:
>
> { "java", true, "sqlj.java_call_handler", NULL,
> "libpljava" },
> { "javaU", false, "sqlj.javau_call_handler", NULL,
> "libpljava" },
In the interest of uniformity, please rename your libraries to omit the
"lib" prefix.
The other problem I see emerging here is that in certain environments,
the "java" language may not be trusted, such as when it is compiled
with GCJ. Then, this built-in template will override the CREATE
LANGUAGE specification and introduce a security hole.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
