ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the new text type wins VARCHAR in many respects,
> I'd like to propose to replace VARCHAR with it.
This idea would impose fairly significant overhead in a number of
places, for instance locating field starts within a tuple. It didn't
appear to me that you'd even tried to measure that overhead is?
Given that slot_getattr and friends are often hotspots, I don't think
the costs involved can be ignored.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
