* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > My proposal therefore is to do #2, #3, and #4, and to modify the TAS > assembly code at least on x86_64. Together, these changes bring > my test case on a 4-way Opteron from > > N, runtime: 1 36s 2 61s 4 105s 8 198s
em64t, 2 proc + 2 HT, 3.4ghz, 4G, 2.6.12:
N, runtime: 1 31s 2 47s 4 86s 8 159s
> to
>
> N, runtime: 1 35s 2 48s 4 58s 8 105s
N, runtime: 1 32s 2 53s 4 90s 8 169s
CPU utilization is definitely higher when running with the patch though.
Hope this helps, happy to do additional testing if necessary.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
