Re: [HACKERS] Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

[Stephen Frost]

* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > em64t, 2 proc + 2 HT, 3.4ghz, 4G, 2.6.12:
> 
> > N, runtime: 1 31s   2 47s   4 86s   8 159s
> 
> > N, runtime: 1 32s   2 53s   4 90s   8 169s
> 
> Er, which (or both) of the two patches did you apply here?

Applied both, sorry that wasn't clear.

        Thanks,

                Stephen

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature