Tom, Luke Lonergan wrote: >>I figure I can back it up...). What would people like to hear about? > > How about future plans, so to speak? You've made some pretty significant > improvements for 8.1 (virtual tuples, the caching algorithm, etc), what's on > deck for 8.2 and beyond?
I'm *really* *really* interested in making PostgreSQL to be vacuum-less. Can we have a vacuum-less PostgreSQL in the future? How? If you have any ideas, I *really* want to hear about that from you. It will be a next generation of PostgreSQL. :) Thanks. -- NAGAYASU Satoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
