> -----Original Message----- > From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 April 2006 12:34 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Hiroshi Inoue > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Practical impediment to supporting > multiple SSL libraries > > However, w.r.t. the copying, the pointers in get PGresult are > in memory belonging to that result. As long as that PGresult > hangs around, you should be able to just copy the pointers > rather than the data? Or is this unacceptable?
It copies the data. I can't think offhand why it was implemented that way, but then I didn't write the code (Anoop & Siva @ Pervasive did). Anyhoo, as I've said, that approach has now been abandoned anyway in favour of Hiroshi's, so it's him you'd need to convince to change. The rest of us have only just started re-learning the code. Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
