"Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, the psqlODBC driver apparently ran into a number of problems with > > libpq that resulted in them not using it for their purpose. Given libpq > > primary purpose is to connect to PostgreSQL, it failing at that is > > something that should be fixed. > > I think you are forgetting, that e.g. a JDBC driver will not want to depend > on an external C dll at all. It will want a native Java implementation > (Group 4). Thus imho it is necessary to have a defined wire protocol, which > we have.
I think you are forgetting that this is a complete nonsequitor. Nobody suggested eliminating the defined wire protocol. Nor was anybody even discussing JDBC. Java folks' fetish for reimplementing everything in Java is entirely irrelevant. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
