Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> It'd be interesting to compare 8.1 and HEAD for the no-overhead case; > >> I don't think you need to redo all four cases, but I'd like to see that > >> one. > > > 8.1: 50,50,49 > > HEAD: 49,48,49 > > OK, so that seems comparable to my results on a dual Xeon ... probably, > both your machine and my newer one have fast-to-read clock hardware. > We need to get some numbers from one of the people who have complained > about EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead.
I'm compiling here without the assert stuff. It takes a while ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
