On 23/06/06, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm -
>> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results.
> Yeah, and this is not a good thing.  Eventually I'd like to get to a
> point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm
> reports.  No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta
> work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build.

Then people who have access to people who own or can provide access to
machines in classes not covered need to do a bit of begging ;-)

The requirements are (deliberately) very modest:

Once it is set up it is close to hands free - you just set up the cron
job(s) or equivalent.


I'll try to set up a buildfarm installation for Cygwin on my computer at work.
But I'm taking the next week off,  so this will have to wait until my return.

Adrian Maier

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to