Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hm, so it could be stored on disk without the length header as long as
> > the length header is added to the in-memory representation? I don't
> > think the type system has hooks for reading and storing data to disk
> > though.
>
> No, it doesn't, and we'd pay a nonzero price for allowing that.
> Currently the executor doesn't have to care (much) about whether a
> tuple is on-disk or in-memory --- the individual datums look the same
> either way. Allowing them to be different would force a lot of
> format conversion steps that currently need not happen.
Is there ever a case where an entire tuple is passed around without knowing
the typmod of an attribute in the tuple?
The conversion would only really have to happen when the attribute is fetched
or stored, not when the tuple is being passed around wholesale. But I have a
feeling that would be more intrusive than just making the entire system typmod
aware.
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
