Josh Berkus wrote:

Perhaps it's no surprise that I disagree when you say PL/J could be considered in the same light as PL/Java. Then again, I'm fairly biased ;-)

This attitude does you no credit, Thomas.

My diplomatic skills are somewhat limited :-) I might be blunt at times. I'm sure there are other more subtle ways to get the message through. I'm trying to be honest and up-front. IMO, that should count for something.

Thomas Hallgren

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to