Aside from obviously the big issue of who maintains all the pgfoundry stuff, I also think that the PostgreSQL family would benefit from a distribution that is more "and the kitchen sink" style. I do not know exactly if Bizgres could be considered just that? Or maybe it could get promoted to be that?
Lukas, that is what www.mammothpostgresql.org is :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake
What I mean is I think it makes absolute sense to keep a very stable, very well maintained core PostgreSQL distribution which is that anyone should base their distributions on. However I do think that PostgreSQL is missing out in getting new users aboard that are in the early stages of evalutation and simply only consider features that they get along with a default installation (mostly due to lack of better knowledge about places like pgfoundry). For these kinds of users it would make sense to provide a distro that has an extended feature list, while sacrificing maybe a tiny bit of stability because it adds modules that do not adhere to the same high level of maintaince as PostgreSQL core does. regards, Lukas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
-- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly