Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >I don't see a strong need for moving pgcrypto into core, and there's > > at least one argument against it: if someone needs a crypto-free > > version of postgres for use someplace with benighted laws, they > > would be screwed. > > Could that be handled with a configure option?
In such a jurisdiction you would possibly have to distribute rebuilt tarballs with all the source code removed. The contrib option makes that much easier. > Quite apart from anything else, it's important that we do get better > docco on these modules. I'm willing to help with DocBook options. What do you have in mind? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
