Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The fundamental problem with find_static is that it hasn't got a clue
>> about likely future changes, nor about what we think external add-ons
>> might want ...
> OK, I don't really have a clue either. Is any of it valid?
I don't object to static-izing AlterOpClassOwner_oid or
RenameRewriteRule, and I defer to Teodor about the gist and gin
functions. The others range somewhere between "no" and "hell no".
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
