Tom Lane wrote: > Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > utils/adt/misc.c says: > > //* Disabled in 8.0 due to reliability concerns; FIXME someday *// > > Datum > > *pg_terminate_backend*(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) > > > Well, AFAIR there were no more issues raised about code paths that don't > > clean up correctly, so can we please > > remove that comment and make the function live finally? > > No, you have that backwards. The burden of proof is on those who want > it to show that it's now safe. The situation is not different than it > was before, except that we can now actually point to a specific bug that > did exist, whereas the original concern was just an unfocused one that > the code path hadn't been adequately exercised. That concern is now > even more pressing than it was.
I am not sure how you prove the non-existance of a bug. Ideas? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
