Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > utils/adt/misc.c says:
> > //* Disabled in 8.0 due to reliability concerns; FIXME someday *//
> > Datum
> > *pg_terminate_backend*(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> > Well, AFAIR there were no more issues raised about code paths that don't 
> > clean up correctly, so can we please
> > remove that comment and make the function live finally? 
> No, you have that backwards.  The burden of proof is on those who want
> it to show that it's now safe.  The situation is not different than it
> was before, except that we can now actually point to a specific bug that
> did exist, whereas the original concern was just an unfocused one that
> the code path hadn't been adequately exercised.  That concern is now
> even more pressing than it was.

I am not sure how you prove the non-existance of a bug.  Ideas?

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to