Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:40:01PM -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > While I am not going to reopen the can of worms labeled 'bug tracker', > > I think it would be good to have a little more formality as far as > > claiming items goes. > > Agreed. > > > I'm picturing something like this: > > > > 1. Each person taking an item agrees to write at least one email each > > week to -hackers detailing progress or lack of same on the item. > > > > 2. Should someone wish to relinquish a claim on a feature, there needs > > to be some standard way to do a hand-off of whatever they've > > done/found and announce that the feature is now available to others to > > claim. > > > > 3. Should the person claiming the feature not communicate to -hackers > > for some period--I'm thinking 3 weeks is about right--the item goes > > back in the unclaimed pool with a message to -hackers saying that > > that's what's happened. > > > > What say? > > It's a shame to have a person burn cycles on this, but anything would be > an improvement over what we've got now. --------
Really? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
