"dror" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Andrew, Regarding to your comments: > 1. a patch is generated by the pro=
> gram "diff"I will do it ,if needed> 2. before we do anything, as Tom Lane s=
> ays, we need verification of the > problem, preferably in writing from Micr=
> osoft.I do understand that, but, de-facto, the current implementation does=
> not work, canceling the redirection (or open a log file) is not a matter o=
> f changing the OS behavior, therefore I don't see why a formal verificatio=
> n from Microsoft is needed.When this issue will be revealed in more and mor=
> e system, it can be harmless to postgress reputation and critical problems =
> for the end users.
The difficulty we're having is that this is a very ugly fix for a problem
that's been reported by no one except you. I tend to agree with
Andreas' theory that what you are seeing is misbehavior of some
antivirus software on your machine, rather than a change of Windows' own
behavior. We are not going to accept this patch without more evidence
that there really has been a change on Microsoft's part.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
