On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:42:11 +0300
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, that solves your problem.  How about my problem where replication
> > has to happen on servers in three countries on two continents and
> > thousands of updates a second have to happen in less that 10ms? 
> For this scenario you are far better off with partitioning than
> replication. 
> That is if your data is partitionable. But geographically distributed
> data often is.

I agree but in this case it wasn't.

D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to