Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What bothers me about what we have now is that we have optional keywords
> before and after INDEX, rather than only between CREATE and INDEX.

Yeah, putting them both into that space seems consistent to me, and
it will fix the problem of making an omitted index name look like
a valid command.

I'm not sure I should be opening this can of worms, but do we want to
use a different keyword than CONCURRENTLY to make it read better there?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to