Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.

> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).

If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
until two weeks after feature freeze?  Sorry, I'm not buying this

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to