At 2006-09-05 10:23:19 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Something like it ought to go into core, but personally I'd opt for > taking the opportunity to redesign the API, which was a bit crufty to > begin with.
I'm happy to do the work right away (not that there's much) if someone suggests a better API. (I don't personally have a need for user-level locks, and if I did, I'd be happy with just user_lock/user_unlock. So if anyone has a more specific idea, I'm all ears.) > That would eliminate all question of whether the clean room was > clean enough. It was really, really clean! Honest! :-) -- ams ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org