Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2006-09-18, James William Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm +1 on the cleaner design you suggested. While I understand the
>> concerns of adding features/API this late;

> Adding features is one thing, breaking existing users of the code is another.

We already have an established solution for people who need backwards
compatibility: download the old userlock code from pgfoundry.  I'm
unclear why we should duplicate that project within core.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to