> > subject says it all. pg_regress starts "postmaster" (pg_regress.c, > > line 1515). Shouldn't this be "postgres" these days? > > No. We're a very long way away from considering removing the > postmaster symlink, so it doesn't matter.
Well, per previous discussion, we're removing postmaster.exe from the win32 installer, because it bloats the distribution wihtout any gain (remember - windows doesn't have symlinks, so we need a complete copy of a file that's 4Mb or so). So it would matter there. > > Actually, a second thought given that I was just bitten by the > > run-tests-as-admin-doesn't-work - should we use pg_ctl to start it? > No, not unless you'd like to break pg_regress's ability to > kill the postmaster --- we need the postmaster to be the > direct child process. D'oh, forgot about that. Nevermind about that part then. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
