"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:19:47PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>> Well, it is already included.  The current proposal is simply to
>> improve the existing type.  I guess you are arguing a different
>> proposal altogether - to remove the existing type.
> The existing type is depricated and has been since at least 8.1; so yes,
> it's slated for removal.

Well, my perception of that has always been "it needs to be upgraded or
removed".  So if D'Arcy wants to work on the improvement angle, I have
no problem with him doing so.  The thing we need to negotiate is "how
much improvement is needed to keep it in core".

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to