"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree that this code is both wrong and unreadable (although in
>> practice the _setmode will probably never fail, which is why our
>> attention hasn't been drawn to it).  Is someone going to submit a
>> patch?  I'm hesitant to change the code myself since I'm not in a
>> position to test it.

> I can look at fixing that. Is it something we want to do for 8.2, or
> wait until 8.3? If there's a hidden bug, I guess 8.2?

Yeah, I think it's 8.2 material.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to