"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think Tom's point is that we should reject only 2.1.  Isn't 
>> that the only version that fails?

> Not entirely sure. I beleive there were older versions that don't work
> as well...

My recollection is that the version immediately prior to 1.875 was
actively broken, and that versions much before that fail to cope with
the current size of our grammar.

What I see in ftp.gnu.org since 1.875 are 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.  We do not
know at this point whether the extra-semicolon bug is present in 2.0
or only 2.1 ... but I will download them and find out.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to