>> 'exists' isn't a good name for function :(.
>>     
>
> Yeah, that isn't going to work.  Perhaps "ifexists"?  Or just leave well
> enough alone.
>
>
>   

Darn. Can't have been thinking clearly this morning.

How about "exist" (no s)?

Maybe 'found', 'present', or 'contains'?  (no, I haven't checked for a grammar conflict)

        -- Korry



Reply via email to