Matt Miller wrote:

> Yeah, and I don't expect that they'll be a rush to commit this to head
> anytime soon.  I'll be happy enough tracking this locally.  I think it's
> a win for my situation.
Why should we add this Oraclism to PostgreSQL? I doesn't add any new
I suggest you to contribute this kind of code to orafce project [1]
because it's not standardized.


  Euler Taveira de Oliveira

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to