* Andrew Dunstan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This isn't really a compromise. Remember that this discussion started > with consideration of optimal record layout (minimising space use by > reducing or eliminating alignment padding). The above proposal really > does nothing for that.
While I agree that's how the discussion started the column ordering
issue can stand on its own and any proposal which provides that feature
should be considered. I don't think we should throw out the
rewrite-the-table idea because it doesn't solve other problems.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
