Stephen Frost wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Stephen Frost wrote: > > > So it's *not* an additional restriction. Not to mention the other > > > reason- the license isn't part of the *work*. > > > > It is an _additional_ license you have to include, not just their > > license. I don't see how requiring an advertizing clause is an > > additional restriction, but requiring an additional license isn't. > > The GPL fully realizes that there may be other licenses out there which > is why it was written to talk about *restrictions*: > > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the > Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the > original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to > these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further > restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. > You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to > this License.
I don't see the distinction here. Where does it say having to include another license is a different additional restriction from an advertizing clause? > > I don't understand the "work" issue as it applies here. Right. I wasn't clear in saying that the idea is whether the BSD and GPL licenses can or cannot be merged into a single work. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
