Stephen Frost wrote: > Yet *having* that requirement on a *derived work* which includes GPL > code is *against* the terms of the GPL. That's *exactly* the issue. > The GPL says more than "you must provide the source code to everything", > it explicitly includes a requirement that no additional restrictions be > put on the derivative (lest requirements for no-additional-distribution > or must-charge-for-other-distribution be added which defeats much of the > point of the GPL).
Our BSD license has this restriction: > provided that the above copyright notice and this > paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies. Why is this not an _additional_ restriction, and hence GPL and BSD software cannot be bundled into a binary? What does "appear in all copies" mean, especially if you don't need to ship the source code under the BSD license? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
